Subscribe
Во последните неколку недели беше објавена студија спроведена од страна на партијата ЕЦР со наслов Балансирање на амбицијата и реалноста. Трезвено испитување на предизвиците во зелената транзиција на ЕУ .
This research aims to bring the debate on the green transition back within a realistic and objective path, based on facts and on the political, economic and industrial reality of the European Union.
A path that can under no circumstances disregard the interests of the agricultural sector and the expectations of the many farmers that make up the economic fabric of the European Union.
The “sobriety” of the analysis in the study is precisely what is needed to address the many problems that this sector has been dragging along for decades.
FARMERS AS CUSTODIANS What must finally reach the chancelleries and the European institutions is the notion that the true guardians of our environment and food sovereignty are not politicians or legislators, but rather the farmers of the European Union.
More than any other sector, it is agriculture that is the pillar on which to base a future European food sovereignty sheltered from climate crises and international market fluctuations.
Unfortunately, among the enemies of this honourable objective, would seem to be also the European “Green Deal” which could target precisely the agricultural sector.
It denies the fundamental role of farmers in preserving the land, a role that ensures quality in production and enhances culture and traditions in rural areas.
Carrying forward a concept, unfortunately too deeply rooted in the European institutions, that sees farmers as a problem.
The hope instead is that this paradigm will be overturned, with the awareness that we have great resources in front of us in the fight against the climate crisis.
The link with the land must be confirmed and enhanced together with agriculture, as protecting excellence and production necessarily leads to the growth of the cultural heritage and the protection of the territories: all functions that the European Union’s policies must be ready to enhance and not to weaken.
A COMMON AGRICULTURAL POLICY TO BE REVIEWED If we really want to reform the sector, we must have the courage to get our hands on the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) with the intention of removing all those regulations that aim at the gradual reduction of cultivated areas and that directly affect farmers’ income.
At the same time, Member States must be put in a position to influence agricultural policies, e.g. by increasing the EU limits set for state aid to the sector, as well as introducing a debt moratorium to give farmers breathing space.
At the same time, in the same vein, it is necessary to revise the so-called “Nature Restoration” rule, which stipulates, as a general objective, that Member States should take restoration measures in at least 20 per cent of the EU’s land areas.
A revision of this objective is necessary to avoid further penalising agriculture and farming.
SYNTHETIC IS NOT NATURAL A crucial point is the protection of the concept of “natural” as a shield against the introduction of synthetic elements in the production and nutrition of EU citizens.
The battle against the production and marketing of synthetic food, especially meat, is a battle that must be continued.
With it, however – and the aim is for these two struggles to continue in unison – animal welfare disciplines must be improved and extended, especially with regard to livestock farming.
LABELS AND MARKET RECIPROCITY A strong stop must be given to all regulations that, in one way or another, penalise the excellence of our agriculture. Најконкретен пример е „Nutriscore“ заедно со задолжителното усвојување на системи за означување на исхраната за прехранбените производи. Меѓу највпечатливите случаи е оној кој се однесува на винскиот сектор, со желба на шишињата да бидат означени со назнака дека самото консумирање на производите е штетно за здравјето. Ова е нешто што бара претпазливост, особено во сектор кој секоја година има толку силно влијание врз економиите на земјите-членки и кој вработува толку многу професионалци низ Европската унија. Конечно, сè уште од аспект на правилата, треба да се спроведе едноставен и многу важен принцип: тој на реципроцитет. Отворањето на нашиот внатрешен пазар за продукции кои не доаѓаат од земјите-членки може да се прифати, но само доколку тие ги почитуваат социјалните и еколошките стандарди што се бараат од нашите производители.