Subscribe
The recent dismissal of Spanish Ambassador to Belgium, Alberto Antón, has caused significant controversy and drawn attention to the inner workings of Spain’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs. This incident, which stems from an unfortunate moment during an official speech, raises questions not only about the specific actions of Foreign Minister José Manuel Albares but also about the broader implications for Spain’s diplomatic service and the quality of its political leadership.
Antón’s reaction to his removal is a pointed and critical response to what he sees as an arbitrary and politically motivated decision. In a letter to Minister Albares, Antón describes the circumstances leading to his dismissal as “torpe, ridícula y mezquina” (clumsy, ridiculous, and mean-spirited). He recounts how he had been ill with a cold and under the effects of antihistamines during the speech, and that he made an effort to attend the conference despite feeling unwell. Antón’s explanation suggests that the incident, in which he was briefly seen resting during the minister’s address, was a minor and forgivable lapse.
However, what stands out most in Antón’s letter is his belief that his dismissal was not a matter of professional misconduct, but rather a political maneuver designed to discredit him. He argues that Minister Albares, in the context of a tense and politically charged atmosphere within the ministry, seized upon this trivial incident to remove him from his post. According to Antón, the subsequent public discussion of the video showing him “sleeping” at the conference served to turn what was initially an innocuous moment into ammunition for his downfall.
The dismissal of Antón has raised serious concerns about the leadership style of Minister Albares and the broader political climate in Spain. Antón’s criticism of the arbitrary nature of his removal speaks to a deeper problem within the Ministry of Foreign Affairs: a growing sense of fear and insecurity among diplomats. Antón notes that the decision to oust him, despite his years of dedicated service, was motivated by something other than his professional conduct or performance in Belgium. This raises alarms about the extent to which personal and political considerations may be influencing decisions that should be made on the basis of merit and professionalism.
The timing of this dismissal is particularly striking. Spain is set to be the guest of honour at the Europalia 2025 festival in Belgium, a significant cultural event in which Spain’s cultural and diplomatic presence will be on display. Antón, who had developed strong professional relationships in Belgium, could have played an important role in ensuring the success of Spain’s participation in this event. His removal, therefore, not only represents a personal loss for Antón but also a missed opportunity for Spain to capitalise on his diplomatic connections and experience during a key moment in its foreign policy.
The circumstances surrounding Antón’s dismissal also suggest a pattern of politically motivated removals within the Spanish foreign service. This follows a similar move earlier when former Secretary of State for the European Union, Juan González-Barba, was dismissed after writing an opinion article on the role of the Spanish monarchy in international relations.
In both cases, the individuals involved were removed from their positions under circumstances that seem to suggest that their views or actions did not align with the current administration’s political agenda. These incidents raise important questions about the extent to which Spain’s foreign policy is becoming increasingly politicised and whether the principle of professional merit is being undermined in favour of ideological conformity.
In addition to the broader political implications, this situation reflects a worrying trend within Spain’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs. The dismissals of experienced diplomats such as Antón and González-Barba may foster an atmosphere of distrust and apprehension within the diplomatic corps, particularly among younger diplomats who may now feel the pressure of having to conform to political expectations rather than relying on their professional skills and judgment. The fear of being removed from office due to ideological differences or minor missteps could have a chilling effect on the effectiveness and morale of the entire diplomatic service.
Moreover, the public nature of Antón’s dismissal, particularly the widespread sharing of the video that led to his removal, highlights a concerning trend in the Spanish political system: the increasing use of media and social platforms to expose and shame public servants. What was initially a private matter within the ministry quickly became a public spectacle, and Antón’s reputation was put in jeopardy as a result. This media-driven approach to political retribution adds another layer of complexity to an already delicate situation and raises questions about the fairness and transparency of the decision-making process.